Source-led profile · Evidence checked 2026-09-02

Verified profile

AI Search software

Kagi

Evaluate Kagi's paid search, privacy model, plan limits and separate Search API through a repeatable result-quality benchmark.

Decision first. Use the compact answer below before opening the complete research record.

Decision summary

The answer in one scan.

Decision-critical facts remain separate from the deeper editorial analysis.

Best fitSubscription search engine with privacy controls, ranking customization and a separately billed API.
PricingConfirm the current plan, allowance and renewal terms for the exact workflow.
Evidence boundaryOfficial-source research; no invented hands-on winner.
Confirm before buyingRun the product-specific evaluation described in the full profile.

Continue your research

Move from profile to a sharper decision.

These links are explicit editorial relationships, not keyword matches or sponsored placements.

Good fit if

The documented workflow matches the real job

  • Subscription search engine with privacy controls, ranking customization and a separately billed API.
  • The buyer can run the profile's bounded evaluation.
  • Approval quality and total operating cost can be measured.

Look elsewhere if

The workflow cannot be validated

  • The decision depends on unsupported output-quality claims.
  • Current commercial or governance terms remain unacceptable.
  • A narrower product completes the same job with less overhead.

Price, plan and risks

Confirm before you buy

Unknown, conflicted and stale facts stay visible before checkout.

Unknown

Pricing observation

The retained evidence does not establish this field yet.

Commercial context

Compare the closest documented workflows.

Alternatives stay within the same vertical and use current internal profile routes.

Open the complete Kagi buying analysisSubscription search engine with privacy controls, ranking customization and a separately billed API.

Kagi asks users to pay directly for search instead of funding it with advertising. That changes incentives, but it does not automatically prove better coverage for a particular job. The purchase should be tested against the result sets a user actually needs.

> Distinctive strength: Ad-free subscription search with domain controls, Lenses and a privacy-first account model. > > Where it stops being an advantage: The Search API is a separate pay-as-you-go product; an individual subscription is not an API allowance.

Plans in practical terms

PlanPublic boundaryBest use
Trial100 total searches and 100 standard-model AI interactionsSmall relevance test
Starter$5/month, 300 searches and 300 interactionsLight search use with a hard monthly count
Professional$10/month, unlimited search and SummarizerFrequent professional search
Ultimate$25/month, premium-model Assistant accessBuyers who value the additional AI layer
Search API$12 per 1,000 queriesApplication retrieval, budgeted separately

Run 100 queries from the user's last month of work. Blind-score useful result in top three, missing known source, freshness, spam/domain concentration and time to a defensible answer. Test raised/lowered domains and a Lens separately so personalization does not contaminate the baseline.

Kagi says searches are not associated with the account and offers Privacy Pass. Buyers still need to distinguish privacy from complete anonymity and review billing/account requirements.

Avoid Kagi when free search is a hard constraint, local coverage is essential but weak in the target region, or the intended use is API-heavy. Compare Brave Search, ChatGPT Search and You.com.

Primary action: Review Kagi's plans, use the trial on a real query set, then choose the smallest plan that clears the benchmark.

Official sources checked

Full evidence record5 fields · official links · dates · states

Pricing observation

UnknownChecked 2026-09-02

The retained official evidence does not answer this yet.