BenPicks · Local worksheet · Method version 2 · 29 October 2026
Compare the same approved output at the same editorial standard. Enter aggregate figures and non-sensitive evidence references only. Note fields are free text: do not include client names, article text, confidential documents or credentials. This file does not send or save entries automatically; keep a copy or print a filled version before closing it.
Use Print or Save as PDF in your browser. Text areas have finite printed space: inspect the print preview and put long notes on a separate page.
| Input and boundary | Current workflow | AI workflow |
|---|---|---|
| Total attempts Include rejected drafts | ||
| Drafting or prompting minutes per attempt Average across all attempts | ||
| Review and correction minutes per attempt Include fact-checking; keep finishing separate | ||
| Finishing minutes per approved article Approved outputs only | ||
| Allocated monthly software cost One common currency | ||
| Variable charge per attempt Exclude already included charges | ||
| One-time setup minutes Do not count again as recurring work |
A revised candidate is not automatically a new full attempt. Count actual cumulative minutes once. Never put the same correction in both review and finishing. A small sample is not a universal acceptance rate.
Monthly modeled cost = F + A × v + (w ÷ 60) × [A × (d + r) + Q × f + S ÷ H]. Q approved articles; A attempts; d draft minutes; r review minutes; f finishing minutes; F monthly software; v variable charge per attempt; w hourly cost; S setup minutes; H allocation months.
Allocated labor is not necessarily avoidable cash. Taxes, revenue, financing, contract exit fees and future price changes are outside this model. A lower cost does not establish quality, rights, suitability or search performance.
Method by BenPicks. Blank worksheet, not a vendor benchmark or a claim of measured savings.